Mediation in Data Breach Resolution: Understanding Processes, Risks, and Advantages

Today, organizations across all industries increasingly understand the value of implementing rigorous cybersecurity measures to protect their digital networks and systems. Nonetheless, malicious threat actors are persistent, and data breaches are an eventuality that most businesses should now expect. Yet data breaches do occur, they can be especially contentious, as intellectual property theft or the exposure of personal records can cause financial and reputational damages, often leading to legal action by affected parties, such as customers. In the face of these disputes, mediation can play a crucial role in streamlining their resolution, providing a neutral, nonbinding forum for discussion and negotiation. Trained mediators with expertise in the subject matter can help parties reach a mutually acceptable resolution more efficiently, avoiding the cost and the uncertain time commitment of litigation. Mediation also offers more confidentiality, greater control over the outcome, and the potential to better preserve business relationships. This seminar will give attorneys insight into mediating data breaches and strategies for achieving the best possible outcomes and client satisfaction. It will also be an opportunity to better understand what motivates data breaches and their potential fallout, as well as to explore alternative dispute resolution as a complement to litigation.
In this online seminar, our expert panelists begin by reviewing the process of mediation and what it entails. Next our speakers provide an overview of the current data breach threat landscape as well as the information targeted in data breaches and the methods of conducting these attacks. Our speakers then present some of the key attributes of mediating data breach disputes and the factors to consider when choosing whether to mediate these conflicts. Finally, our experts provide insight into the role of the mediator and the key elements for choosing an effective mediator and form of mediation.

Our Mission is to bridge the knowledge gap between law and technology professionals by educating attorneys on technology to attorneys and technology executives on its laws and regulations. Legal Cyber Academy provides a comprehensive tool and evolving knowledge base through exclusive insights from world class cybersecurity, privacy, web 3.0, forensic, and e-discovery legal and technical practitioners. Earn CLE, CPE, and CE credits. (Refunds are available if you do not receive credit) At Legal Cyber Academy We recognize that technology, the cybersecurity threats it faces, and relevant laws and regulation are rapidly evolving, presenting unique challenges and opportunities. Our platform is dedicated to empowering legal professionals with the skills and understanding necessary to navigate the complex landscape of technology in their field, enabling them to effectively advise clients, draft contracts, and navigate legal implications in a technology-driven world. Simultaneously, we strive to equip technology professionals with the legal knowledge they need to make informed decisions, ensure compliance with regulations, and limit liability. By fostering a deep understanding of legal frameworks, we hope to support technology professionals in creating innovative, compliant, and socially conscious technological advancements. Join us in our mission to reshape the way legal professionals and technology experts understand and interact with each other in a rapidly changing technical and legal landscape. Together, they will mitigate risk better, ensure compliance, and actively shape the future of technology and its accompanying laws.

LAW & FORENSICS LLC – FOUNDER; JAMS – NEUTRAL; HARVARD – ADJUNCT;
Danie Garrie, Esq., is the Co-Founder of Law & Forensics LLC, where he heads the Computer Forensics and digital discovery Cybersecurity teams. Daniel has been a dominant voice in the computer forensics and cybersecurity space for the past 20 years, as an attorney and technologist. He is an adjunct professor at Harvard for Computer Forensics, and prior to Law & Forensics, he successfully built and sold several technology start-up companies. Since co-founding Law & Forensics LLC in 2008, Daniel has built it into one of the leading boutique firms specializing in cybersecurity and forensic engineering. He is a mediator, arbitrator, and e-discovery special master for JAMS and is a partner and head of Cybersecurity practice at Zeichner, Ellman & Krause LLP. Daniel earned both a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree in computer science from Brandeis University, as well as a J.D. from Rutgers Law School. Daniel has led cyber and forensic teams in some of the most visible and sensitive incidents in the United States. He and his team have worked globally for two of the top five banks and dozens of the largest private and public companies in the world. In addition, Daniel has been awarded several patents for advanced cybersecurity and forensic platforms he built with his team, including TableTop.AI, CustodyTrack.IO, and Forensic Scan. Daniel is also well-published in the cybersecurity space and has authored more than 200 articles and books. His work is cited by Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Ed. defining the terms 'software', 'internet', and 'algorithm'. Lastly, he has been recognized by several United States Supreme Court Justices for his legal scholarship and is a trusted source and thought leader for cybersecurity articles and opinions, cited over 500 times to date.

Attorney | Reed Smith
Steve has represented commercial policyholders in complex insurance disputes for nearly 30 years. Steve helps clients find strategic and creative solutions for resolving disputed insurance claims, including focused negotiations and mediation, to maximize their recoveries while minimizing their costs. Through thorough claim analysis and advocacy, Steve has helped policyholder clients successfully obtain reversals of scores of adverse coverage determinations without the need for litigation. But when necessary, he aggressively litigates coverage lawsuits on their behalf in state and federal courts throughout the country. Recognized by his insurance coverage bar peers as one of The Best Lawyers in America for “Insurance Law,” Steve advises clients on coverage issues involving all types of commercial insurance policies. He regularly assists clients in matters involving directors and officers claims, professional services/errors and omissions claims, environmental contamination and other mass tort claims, products-related claims, cutting-edge cyber/privacy claims, and governmental investigation claims, among others. With Steve's help, his clients have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance proceeds. Steve also helps clients prevent coverage disputes on the front end by reviewing their existing policies, identifying potential coverage gaps, and recommending areas of possible improvement at renewal. He counsels clients on assessing and preserving the value of potential insurance claims, obtaining defense coverage (even if damages may not be covered), and insurance issues in corporate transactions. Steve regularly publishes articles and speaks on coverage-related issues, and is regularly quoted by leading insurance publications. He has been elected by his peers as a Fellow of the American College of Coverage Counsel, which recognizes the nation's top insurance coverage attorneys. In addition to his coverage work, Steve handles other types of commercial disputes, including complex contractual and indemnity disputes. He also has a long-standing commitment to pro bono work, and has represented victims of domestic violence for his entire career, as well as victims of human trafficking, clients with developmental disabilities, foreign nationals seeking asylum, and African American farmers subject to discriminatory loan practices.

Neutral | JAMS
Hon. Moshe Jacobius (Ret.) has a stellar reputation as an attorney and a jurist. Judge Jacobius served as an Illinois Assistant Attorney General for 17 years, rising to lead the Worker’s Compensation Division and General Law (Civil Litigation) Division under two Attorneys General. Judge Jacobius served as a Cook County, Illinois, jurist for 31 years. He served as a family law judge for twenty years, including ten years as Presiding Judge of the Domestic Relations Division, hearing virtually all issues involving divorce, parentage, and domestic violence matters. Thereafter, Judge Jacobius served for ten years as Presiding Judge of the Chancery Division and presided over cases involving public governance issues, injunctions, class actions, declaratory judgments, real estate, contract matters, corporate and LLC litigation and dissolutions of partnerships and corporations, creditors’ rights, liens, constructions of wills and trusts, mortgage foreclosures, mechanic’s liens, trusteeships, receiverships, and statutory and administrative reviews.

Neutral | JAMS
Hon. James Orenstein (Ret.) joins JAMS following a prominent legal career that included 16 years as a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of New York; several years as a litigator in private practice, including most recently at a firm specializing in technology and privacy law; and over a decade as a successful federal prosecutor and Justice Department official. Judge Orenstein oversaw discovery and helped achieve settlements in cases involving a wide array of class action and individual claims, including those involving antitrust, business disputes, civil rights, construction, copyright violations, defamation, employment discrimination, ERISA, fee disputes, fraud, insurance coverage, legal malpractice, maritime disputes, medical practice, patent infringement, personal injury, products liability, RICO, securities, trademark infringement, and wage and hour laws. While on the bench, Judge Orenstein achieved national recognition for his pioneering opinions on the law surrounding the use of location tracking, encryption and other modern technologies and their effect on personal privacy. Following his retirement from the court, Judge Orenstein entered private practice, where he built on his judicial work in the field of technology and privacy. He counseled technology companies on the privacy impact of new products and services and compliance with U.S. and European data privacy laws and represented them in responding to government requests for their customers’ personal data and in litigation arising from such statutory privacy regimes as the Telephone Communications Privacy Act and the Video Privacy Protection Act. He was also appointed as an amicus curiae by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Just before joining JAMS, Judge Orenstein was appointed to help the special master in Trump v. United States resolve complex assertions of privilege and novel issues under the Presidential Records Act arising from the government’s search of the former president’s home. The court in that case agreed that “the efficient administration of the Special Master’s duties requires the assistance of the Honorable James Orenstein (Ret.), … who has experience with complex case management, privilege review, warrant procedures, and other matters.” Before his judicial appointment, Judge Orenstein served as an assistant United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, where he investigated and prosecuted hundreds of cases and was a member of the team that successfully prosecuted notorious mob boss John Gotti. Following the 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City, Judge Orenstein was selected to be part of the trial team that prosecuted the two men responsible for the attack. He then served as an attorney adviser at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, where he advised the attorney general and the White House on constitutional matters and helped resolve legal disputes between executive branch agencies. He was later appointed deputy associate attorney general. In that role, he headed a departmental task force on crime victims’ rights—a subject about which he has testified to Congress on multiple occasions—and oversaw the Justice Department’s responses to overlapping congressional and special counsel investigations into the 1993 tragedy at the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas. Upon leaving the Justice Department, Judge Orenstein was a founding partner of the New York City office of Baker Hostetler. A sought-after mediator, Judge Orenstein brings his depth of knowledge and finely tuned ADR skills to every matter before him, from five-figure wage disputes to emotionally fraught discrimination and civil rights actions to multibillion-dollar antitrust class actions. He looks for every chance to turn an issue into an opportunity to bring the parties together to consider settlement—whether a scheduling disagreement at the start of the case, a discovery dispute during its development or dispositive motion practice when the case is ready for trial. As an arbitrator, mediator, special master/referee and neutral evaluator Judge Orenstein now brings to JAMS his diverse legal experience to help parties achieve a fair and efficient resolution of their disputes.